Since the 2012 Presidential Election, few things have incited as much controversy as the push for an immigration reform which will effectively put 11 million illegal immigrants on the path to citizenship. Some are irate, labeling such an objective as “amnesty for illegals”. Others, such as Senator Dick Urbin, have tried to seek out a middle path – one that will effectively create a working class of second-class citizens who may be utilized for the cheap, unskilled labor that Americans simply don’t want to do.
In the midst of all this, the call is going out for tighter border control. We may plant a mammoth female statue in New York Harbor bearing the title “Mother of Exiles” in the time-honored poem that beckons forth “…your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…” but we will be certain to bar the gates. After all, if someone were to break into your home, eat your food, take your money, and use your resources, you would have them arrested rather than offer them a sandwich. At least, this is the argument.
This fails to acknowledge, however, that we went into their homes to acquire that food; that their cupboards and resources are barren because we have systems that funnel their resources into our own backyard. Mortimer Arias cut to the heart of this in his article Centripetal Mission, or Evangelization by Hospitality which was published in the greater book The Study of Evangelism: Exploring a Missional Practice of the Church. In it, he observed that
“[This] country, which has more than two hundred military bases around the world; which inundates with its mass media production through millions of TV sets, newspapers, magazines, books, and thousands of cultural centers; which is the main supplier of arms in the world; which wants to have access and freedom of enterprise on its own terms in every market around the globe; which consumes 40 percent of all the natural resources of the earth; which considers itself the defender of “freedom and democracy” on six continents; which looks at Korea, the Persian Gulf, or El Salvador as its own zone of “national security” – that nation cannot expect to remain isolated and to keep its frontiers closed to that world that it is pretending to lead!”
Three Reasons for Cultivating a Theology of Hospitality
So, then, we are faced with an influx of immigrants, some legal but many not, and we have to wrestle with what to do with them. It is here that Christians must come face to face with our own theology of hospitality, not just as individuals but as a society. How are we to treat the foreigner in our midst, especially if that foreigner’s presence is a violation of national law? How are we to respond when, rather than launching out from the US to go as missionaries to foreign contexts and cultures, these cultures are arriving en masse on our own shores? How are we to embody a theology of hospitality that approaches illegal immigrants in a manner faithful to Scripture and the Christian tradition?
I contend that these are important questions, the responses to which far too often flow out of a nationalist worldview rather than a Christian one. Yet, to be faithful to our Christian identity, we have to be willing to challenge the prevailing notions which define insiders and outsiders. We have to be willing to rethink our responsibility to the powerless who risk life and law with the anticipation of escaping their poverty and offering hope to their families. We need to careful construct a theology of hospitality for three key reasons.
- Scripture was seldom written for a people in power. With the exception of a brief golden age of Israel, the intended recipients of Scripture were inevitably a people under occupation, and were often a people in exile. Israel’s story is almost exclusively told while under the thumb of Pharaoh, or Nebuchadnezzar, or Darius, or numerous other monarchs backed by the military might of a powerful empire. Jesus yielded to the occupying prefect of Israel, and was crucified. The early church was scattered under the oppressive hand of a persecuting government. To read Scripture from the vantage point of a citizen of the world’s leading superpower is to inevitably read with a tainted lens. The people at our shores are the people in Scripture: the persecuted, the abandoned, the impoverished, and the exiled. We must think carefully about how we respond to their presence.
- The Old Testament speaks extensively about how we treat the foreigners among us. Exodus 22:21, for example, say that “you must not mistreat or oppress foreigners in any way. Remember, you yourselves were once foreigners in the land of Egypt.” Similarly, we read in Deuteronomy 24:14 that we are to “never take advantage of poor and destitute laborers, whether they are fellow Israelites or foreigners living in your towns.” Foreigners, who would often come to escape persecution from some other realm (much as they still do today), were often seen in the same light as the poor, the widowed, and the orphaned. That is, the people of Israel were charged with their care. We must think carefully about whether to do likewise.
- The New Testament does away with insider/outsider distinctions. According to Paul, “there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28 ESV) When we are baptized into a new creation, we become united in a manner which does not erase our distinctions, but rather draws us together into a social order which transcends the divisive nature these distinctions previously held. As the goal of the Christian community is to live together in such a way so as to invite people into the Christian story and disciple one another into a transformed people, we must carefully think about how this collective living applies to immigration.
The challenge of illegal immigration, for Christians, is not a nationalism issue, it is a theological one. If we are to live faithfully, we must be willing to engage this cultural influx from the perspective of a cultivated theology of hospitality, answering the question of how we welcome and love a people whose very presence here constitutes a violation of the laws of our land.
How do you see the interplay between theology and the immigration crisis?
Image Credit: Laver Rue

Holly Anne February 6, 2013 at 4:20 pm
Well said!
In my humble opinion, I do believe that the “crisis” was brought on ourselves. I won’t claim to understand the law in full, but I do know that it is incredibly difficult to become an american citizen. So I really can’t blame these people for living here illegally. I wish it were easier for them! That’s the point of America.
I am personally against illegal immigration, not because I hate the people – I certainly don’t and it is a HUGE opportunity to witness — but only because it is hurting our own economy.
In the end, economy isn’t going to matter, but I don’t want to condone the practice of illegal immigration either. Everyone should live here if they want, but do so honestly. I think that is what the argument is today.
But yes, Christians should be more understanding and sympathetic and helpful rather than verbally abusive and ignorant.
Loved this post!
T. E. Hanna February 6, 2013 at 4:33 pm
You’re right Holly. Not only is citizenship extremely difficult, it is EXTREMELY expensive. This effectively blocks the poor who are coming here to escape poverty from being able to do so in any legal manner. The only ones who are allowed in are generally those who bring wealth with them.
I also agree with what you are saying about the economy, to an extent. But if we want to go there, I think we also need to realize that our economy is often supported on the backs of the poor outside our borders. Our largest corporations consistently find cheap labor in foreign nations, and then bring all the resources back here. As a result, we further the poverty that exists on a global level and strip an already impoverished people of their resources so that our economy can thrive. Simply by virtue of living in the US and owning a car, we find ourselves within the wealthiest 10% of the global population. So, this forces me to question how we view our economy in connection with our responsibility to those whose poverty enabled our wealth.
Mark Capron February 7, 2013 at 8:24 am
I am awed by the audacity of those who are well content to close the gate behind them. We make our policies so complex, but I am reminded of Andrew, who upon finding something wonderful and good, went immediately to his brother to “come and see/come and find.” I am a participant of this great land because of nothing greater than the geography of my birth. What right of exclusion does that afford to me? John wrote that love casts out all fear. Isn’t immigration policy based on fear? It’s like my kids stuffing donuts in their mouths in the fear that scarcity will deprive them of their fair share. By the way, a donut shared tastes better. It’s true. I recently learned that half a peanut butter cup shared with my wife was so much better than a whole one alone. I may digress, but I think our obligation upon sharing in this great thing is to welcome others to come and see, come and share.
Susan February 7, 2013 at 5:19 pm
This has something that has bothered me in the back of my mind for a while! I have not been comfortable at times with comments Christians make on FB about this issue. Thanks for bringing it out in the open. Sometimes (dare I say it) I am not comfortable with the American feeling of superiority going hand in hand with the gospel. Can it?
Wendy February 19, 2013 at 4:41 pm
In the first place, Jesus came to earth to offer salvation. The Gospel of Jesus was a Gospel of sharing, both earthly comforts and the comfort of the heavenly state. The New Testament does not include references to Jesus making temporal law or running for public office. We were instructed to “seek first the Kingdom of Heaven, and all these things will follow.”
Secondly, coming to the U.S. does not ensure a comfortable life. Many of our great-grandparents worked up to 16 hours a day in sweatshops just to keep a roof over their heads. That’s what coming to America meant to them.
Rather, America’s missionaries ought to get their noses to the grindstone of true salvation, and help the poor in this country and other countries come to the realization that the Kingdom of Heaven is not of this earth at all.
Yes, I hope every person in the world has a good meal and a warm place to sleep every day, but missionaries ought to be encouraging faith in God, not faith in a fantasy someplace.
T. E. Hanna February 19, 2013 at 6:12 pm
So do you think that the Kingdom of God has any implications for life now on earth, or is this life just preparation for the next? Also, do you see any importance in social justice?
Wendy February 19, 2013 at 8:06 pm
The Kingdom of God is among us at all times whether an individual is aware of this or not. His or her willingness to participate is his or her salvation. May I ask whose concept of social justice you have in mind? An individual may have few earthly resources, yet he may be wealthy beyond most people’s belief in heavenly terms. My advice to you is, keep informed, and then go vote! I believe your heart is in the right place. No, I don’t know the chapter or verse, but I know that Jesus said, “Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, and render unto God that which is Gods.”
T. E. Hanna February 19, 2013 at 9:23 pm
I would agree that the kingdom is breaking in among us at all times, and that we are called to be a part of it. I would also suggest that a key part of participating in it IS social justice – caring for the poor, standing against oppression and injustice, living in ways that are contrary to the earthly powers and oppressive government systems, and fighting for the welfare of the “least of these”.
These are not fringe activities, but central core elements of the Christian way; these are manners in which God’s salvation is made manifest in human society.
Marianne March 9, 2013 at 8:49 am
This article is so relevant. If we realise that Jesus was the ultimate stranger among us, it is especially striking that Christians devote so little effort to elevating the suffering of those innocent who become strangers in our globalised world.
Today I posted an article and a poem-translation on this topic – I would be immensely grateful for your support and feedback.
“Globalisation of love: a poem dedicated to all migrants”
http://familyhurts.wordpress.com/2013/03/09/globalisation-of-love-a-poem-dedicated-to-all-migrants/